ROCHESTER, N.Y. — A grand jury has chosen not to criminally charge Rochester police officers whose restraint of Daniel Prude may have caused his death, the state attorney general announced Tuesday.
“I know that the Prude family, the Rochester community and communities across the country will rightfully be disappointed by this outcome,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in announcing the grand jury’s decision. “My office presented an extensive case, and we sought a different outcome than the one the grand jury handed us today.”
She added, “The criminal justice system has frustrated efforts to hold law enforcement officers accountable for the unjustified killing of unarmed African Americans. What binds these cases is a tragic loss of life in circumstances in which the death could have been avoided.”
James promised a “comprehensive report” would be released to the media. The report would include a “minute-by-minute account” of the events of March 22 and 23.
A grand jury had been impaneled Sept. 5 to decide if there were grounds for criminal prosecution in the incident in which Prude died after three Rochester officers restrained him.
James, who is tasked with investigating cases in which unarmed civilians die at the hands of police, revealed the grand jury findings in a news conference at Aenon Missionary Baptist Church.
Last year, after the medical examiner’s office ruled Prude’s death a homicide, the district attorney’s office forwarded the case to the attorney general for possible prosecution.
Prude lost oxygen to his brain while being pinned to the ground by police as they waited for a medical transport.
Lawyers for the police have contended that the restraint used on Prude, with one officer holding his head to the ground and another pinning his lower body, followed the techniques they were taught. It’s possible that the officers testified before the grand jury.
Local activists and critics of the restraint say the police did not need to forcefully hold Prude down; he was naked and handcuffed behind his back.
Prude’s death set off nights of protest in Rochester, with activists contending that police should not have been the primary responders to what was a mental health episode.
On March 23, police received a call of a man acting erratically in southwest Rochester and breaking windows. Police found Prude, who had been taken to Strong Memorial Hospital hours earlier but not admitted, wandering the streets naked.
The encounter with police led to his restraint, and he stopped breathing and lost oxygen to his brain. He was revived but died a week later.
Stanley Martin, one of the Free the People ROC activists who led protests last year, said Monday before James’ announcement, “I was initially hopeful about a grand jury proceeding and that possibly leading to some kind of justice for the Prude family.
“I’m more so gearing up for what looks like healing for the (Prude) family if they are indeed let down,” she said. She said the community needs to continue to push for better mental health services and less police presence, especially with mental health episodes like Prude’s.
The attorney general announced in September, after news of Prude’s death became public, that she would empanel a grand jury. That process presented logistical complications because of COVID-19. The downtown Hall of Justice has been reconfigured for grand juries to have necessary space for social distancing, and the regional administrative judge, state Supreme Court Justice Craig Doran, had to find space for an additional grand jury.
Later in the fall, the grand jury convened, typically meeting just once a week. The term of the grand jury expired in January, but an extension was granted.
Beyond the grand jury investigation, the fallout over Prude’s death has been far reaching.
Mayor Lovely Warren fired Police Chief La’Ron Singletary, and the leadership of the police department was overhauled.
City streets for weeks were the site of mass protests, which included instances of property destruction, and the city council launched an investigation into the mayor’s handling of the homicide.
Warren has maintained she was kept in the dark about the specifics of the death for months, while others have questioned what she knew and when.
Meanwhile, the city has ratcheted up efforts to improve its mental health response to emergency calls about troubled individuals.
Follow Gary Craig on Twitter: @gcraig1